Microbiology FDA 483 (Aurobindo/Eugia Pharma) : No adequate validation of the aseptic process to prevent microbiological contamination
Observation
Facility Type
Firm / Company
Eugia Pharma Specialities Limited
System
Details
(1) Block *** Line *** re-qualification and *** exposure were not adequately performed:
(a) During *** re-qualification, Chemical Indicators (CI) and Biological Indicators (BI) were not placed at the worst case location of each *** folds in the *** sections of the *** were observed. However, CI and BI were placed only on the smooth surface of each *** during *** qualification cycles.
(b) There is no written procedure on how to use *** appropriately to prepare the *** for cycle. Partially ****** and folds in the *** areas were seen receiving *** prior to commercial manufacturing.
(2) The following deficiencies were observed during review of air flow visualization studies (smoke studies):
(a) Smoke studies for Block *** Line *** was not conducted under dynamic condition. Although various interventions were performed, the filling line remained static and did not simulate the commercial manufacturing condition. For example, removal a fallen vial was simulated at the *** location. The operator removed a fallen vial that was staged next to a few standing vials. However, under the true dynamic condition, the *** would be filled with empty vials and moving.
(b) For the Block *** Line *** the operator’s activities in *** sterile *** stoppers obstructed the path of unidirectional flow (first air) by reaching their arm over the ***. The operator also created turbulent air when he shook the canister in quick and short motions to release *** stoppers to the ***.
(c) On filling Line *** the simulation of removing a jammed *** stopper at the *** stopper bowl did not include simulation of reaching into the bowl.
(d) Review of the Air Flow Visualization Studies and the Air Flow Visualization Study Protocol E3-UTL-RQ-P-00***, entitled, “Dynamic Air Flow Visualization Studies”, for Line *** Block *** used to aseptically fill vials for the U.S. market, revealed that the study failed to assess air flow while the filling machine was running (dynamic condition).
The firm management stated the same smoke study approach applies to all Block *** and Block *** aseptic fill lines.
(3) Qualification of the HVAC system for the Line *** machine did not demonstrate it can maintain appropriate air quality for aseptic filling of US market *** and *** products.
(a) The *** of the *** occurs in an area that has been classified Grade C with no overhead HEPA coverage. No NVPC data has been collected in this area to demonstrate appropriate particle control. Smoke studies have not evaluated whether air flow from this area would allow air to ingress into the Grade A filling zone.
(b) Smoke studies of the Grade A filling zone demonstrate turbulence near the area where containers are filled. The smoke studies do not evaluate if air from surrounding areas can ingress into the filling zone. There has been no dynamic NVPC data of the Grade A
Record Date
FEI Number
Country
Citation Type
Audit Duration (Days)
Investigators
More observations from same firm / company
FDA 483 relevant to Microbiology
Disclaimer: The purpose of this article is to provide helpful information on FDA 483s related to microbiological issues. This article represents 483 information in Tabular form for quick access and easy navigation. Information for this article is derived from “Form FDA 483” (Inspectional Observation). This article is not intended to replace the information provided by the FDA, nor is it guaranteed to be complete, always refer official FDA site for details.